On 13/03/16 00:48, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
Brad Campbell <[email protected]> writes:
On 08/03/16 04:41, Simon Hobson wrote:
VNC is lousy over anything but a very fast link, it's just a remote
framebuffer - anything painted to the screen is bit copied to the
client which is bandwidth intensive.
Whereas tightvnc works quite well over almost anything, and if you are
willing to drop to a small colour pallete
Considering that tightvnc is Windows-only software it seems a bit out of
Que? Better not tell any of my linux boxes that have been using it as
both a server and client for many more years than I care to remember.
brad@srv:~$ apt-cache search tightvnc | grep -i tightvnc
tightvnc-java - TightVNC java applet and command line program
ssvnc - Enhanced TightVNC viewer with SSL/SSH tunnel helper
tightvncserver - virtual network computing server software
xtightvncviewer - virtual network computing client software for X
I've snipped the remainder of your un-informed rant.
Brad.
_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
