On 05/03/16 14:31, aitor_czr wrote: > Hi Daniel, Didier > >> Le 14/03/2016 00:07, Daniel Reurich a écrit : >>> > I'd suggest using a version like: >>> > 0.1.jude<date version>+<devuan release starting with 1 >>> > >>> > That way when Jude does switch to versioned releases we can assume his >>> > version scheme easily assuming that he starts with > 0.1. > > Something like this? > > 0.1.20160314+1deb1 > > I was purposing something like this: > > 0.1.d5d965-jessie1 >
Isn't this one of the typical use-cases of the "epoch" field in debian version strings? https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-Version Sorry if I repeat something that has been mentioned already, I didn't follow the whole thread. -- Mat <[email protected]>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
