On 15/03/16 01:51, Mat wrote: > On 05/03/16 14:31, aitor_czr wrote: >> Hi Daniel, Didier >> >>> Le 14/03/2016 00:07, Daniel Reurich a écrit : >>>>> I'd suggest using a version like: >>>>> 0.1.jude<date version>+<devuan release starting with 1 >>>>> >>>>> That way when Jude does switch to versioned releases we can assume his >>>>> version scheme easily assuming that he starts with > 0.1. >> >> Something like this? >> >> 0.1.20160314+1deb1 >> >> I was purposing something like this: >> >> 0.1.d5d965-jessie1 >> > > Isn't this one of the typical use-cases of the "epoch" field in debian > version strings?
Yup, but we can avoid them for this temporary situation until proper versioning is established. -- Daniel Reurich Centurion Computer Technology (2005) Ltd. 021 797 722
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
