On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 01:31:10PM +0000, aitor_czr wrote: > Hi Daniel, Didier > > >Le 14/03/2016 00:07, Daniel Reurich a écrit : > >>>I'd suggest using a version like: > >>>0.1.jude<date version>+<devuan release starting with 1 > >>> > >>>That way when Jude does switch to versioned releases we can assume his > >>>version scheme easily assuming that he starts with > 0.1. > > Something like this? > > 0.1.20160314+1deb1 > > I was purposing something like this: > > 0.1.d5d965-jessie1 > > There is not a great difference between both. If you prefer to use > the date instead of the short commit, i will do so.
The whole point with version numbers is to be able to compare them to know which is more up-to-date. Wouldn't using a hash conflict with this? -- hendrik _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
