On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 05:57:27PM -0400, Steve Litt wrote: [cut]
> > > > however this is all abstract speculation now. I'm not even sure we'll > > make such a big change in testing. most people and organizations > > switching to Devuan today (me included) are in need of a system that > > does not change their workflow arbitrarily. > > Yes. I would recommend against *any* init change in the foreseeable > future. All I'm saying is that *if and when* we change, the change > should be to something very different from sysvinit. Something like > Epoch, Runit, or s6. > IMHO, if and when we would like to make a change regarding init systems, that change should not be to replace sysvinit with an init system of *our* choice, but probably towards allowing users to use the non-invasive init of *their* choice. My2Cents KatolaZ -- [ Enzo Nicosia aka KatolaZ --- GLUG Catania -- Freaknet Medialab ] [ me [at] katolaz.homeunix.net -- http://katolaz.homeunix.net -- ] [ GNU/Linux User:#325780/ICQ UIN: #258332181/GPG key ID 0B5F062F ] [ Fingerprint: 8E59 D6AA 445E FDB4 A153 3D5A 5F20 B3AE 0B5F 062F ] _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
