KatolaZ <[email protected]> writes: > On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 05:57:27PM -0400, Steve Litt wrote: > > [cut] > >> > >> > however this is all abstract speculation now. I'm not even sure we'll >> > make such a big change in testing. most people and organizations >> > switching to Devuan today (me included) are in need of a system that >> > does not change their workflow arbitrarily. >> >> Yes. I would recommend against *any* init change in the foreseeable >> future. All I'm saying is that *if and when* we change, the change >> should be to something very different from sysvinit. Something like >> Epoch, Runit, or s6. >> > > IMHO, if and when we would like to make a change regarding init > systems, that change should not be to replace sysvinit with an init > system of *our* choice, but probably towards allowing users to use the > non-invasive init of *their* choice.
Amen. _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
