Steve Litt wrote: > Katolaz > > IMHO, if and when we would like to make a change regarding init > > systems, that change should not be to replace sysvinit with an init > > system of *our* choice, but probably towards allowing users to use the > > non-invasive init of *their* choice. > > Yes. The user should have an easy choice of inits. What I meant was > that SOME init must be default, and if that default init is ever not > sysvinit, it should be something very different from sysvinit.
e.g. something without the complex run levels and symlink farms of sysvinit. > SteveT > > Steve Litt > May 2016 featured book: Rapid Learning for the 21st Century > http://www.troubleshooters.com/rl21 > _______________________________________________ > Dng mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng -- Joel Roth _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
