I don't see any problem with a generic interface to the things that libsystemd does , if one could be arrived at, or if the current API is sufficiently generic.
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017, 17:34 Dragan FOSS <dragan.f...@gmx.com> wrote: > On 17.06.2017. 00:53, Hendrik Boom wrote: > > libsystemd0 provides the interfaces of systemd for those pieces of > software that > > require them, but provides the empty implementations; i.e., informing > the caller > > that the requested acton is not available. > > > > It is completely compatible with not having systemd, and provides an easy > > migration path for packages that are designed to test for the presence > of systemd > > and not use it if it is absent. > > > Some types of benign tumors can become cancerous over time, so early > detection and removal can make all the difference ;) > > Dragan > _______________________________________________ > Dng mailing list > Dng@lists.dyne.org > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng >
_______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
