On Fri, Jun 16, 2017, 6:02 PM Dragan FOSS <dragan.f...@gmx.com> wrote:
> On 17.06.2017. 02:39, Bruce Perens wrote: > > I don't see any problem with a generic interface to the things that > > libsystemd does , if one could be arrived at, or if the current API is > > sufficiently generic. > > > I don't see any purpose that *any* package has a libsystemd dependency > in distribution with systemd removed? > Although the design of systemd is unacceptable, the facilities it provided to desktop applications are not all uniformly bad ideas. Providing a generic and well architected way for many init systems and non-init utilities to provide such services through one common API is not anathema, even if the API looks like libsystemd0 or the library bears The Accursed Name. >
_______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
