On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 10:45:29AM -0500, dev wrote:
> On 07/03/2017 10:40 AM, Evilham wrote:
> <snip>
> 
> > That's the thing, we can do that :-) probably should, but the "right
> > way" (from a standards point of view) would be to actually allow those
> > names ^^ not to disallow them. So instead of modifying the way useradd
> > works, the way adduser works should be fixed (so, shadow).
> 
> That was easy ;) Seems to be a flag for that.
> 
> # adduser 0day --force-badname
> Allowing use of questionable username.
> Adding user `0day' ...
> Adding new group `0day' (1000) ...
> Adding new user `0day' (1000) with group `0day' ...
> Creating home directory `/home/0day' ...
> Copying files from `/etc/skel' ...
> Enter new UNIX password:

When you think to have found something totally wrong in unix, you most
probably have not looked deep enough :)

HND

KatolaZ

-- 
[ ~.,_  Enzo Nicosia aka KatolaZ - GLUGCT -- Freaknet Medialab  ]  
[     "+.  katolaz [at] freaknet.org --- katolaz [at] yahoo.it  ]
[       @)   http://kalos.mine.nu ---  Devuan GNU + Linux User  ]
[     @@)  http://maths.qmul.ac.uk/~vnicosia --  GPG: 0B5F062F  ] 
[ (@@@)  Twitter: @KatolaZ - skype: katolaz -- github: KatolaZ  ]

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng

Reply via email to