On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 10:45:29AM -0500, dev wrote: > On 07/03/2017 10:40 AM, Evilham wrote: > <snip> > > > That's the thing, we can do that :-) probably should, but the "right > > way" (from a standards point of view) would be to actually allow those > > names ^^ not to disallow them. So instead of modifying the way useradd > > works, the way adduser works should be fixed (so, shadow). > > That was easy ;) Seems to be a flag for that.
But they should work without the flag. The flag will allow usernames that are *really* questinoable. -- hendrik > > # adduser 0day --force-badname > Allowing use of questionable username. > Adding user `0day' ... > Adding new group `0day' (1000) ... > Adding new user `0day' (1000) with group `0day' ... > Creating home directory `/home/0day' ... > Copying files from `/etc/skel' ... > Enter new UNIX password: > _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
