Le 30/10/2017 à 08:44, Dr. Nikolaus Klepp a écrit :
Am Montag, 30. Oktober 2017 schrieb J. Fahrner:
https://osseu17.sched.com/event/ByYt/replace-your-exploit-ridden-firmware-with-linux-ronald-minnich-google
Nice. But it they suffer from the "not invented here"-syndrome: instead of using prooven
good busysbox, they rewrite userspace in GO .. oops, who "invented" Go and wants to push
it to the users?
Nik, Though I agree that Busybox is proven good, it remains that
the said system is more than an OS and is to run at least one
application on top of Busybox. This application must be written in some
language.
Busybox provides interpreted languages, Ash, Hush and Awk, but I
doubt they would be a good choice for a complex application. The
application should rather be written in some compiled language and one
cannot deny the author the choice of this language, provided it is open
source. You know what my preferred language would be, but, from what
I've briefly read about Go, it seems to be based on not so bad rationale.
Didier
_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
