oops, I forgot the link to the paper: look at page 4. https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/atc15/atc15-paper-minnich.pdf
Nik Am Montag, 30. Oktober 2017 schrieb Dr. Nikolaus Klepp: > Am Montag, 30. Oktober 2017 schrieb Didier Kryn: > > Le 30/10/2017 à 08:44, Dr. Nikolaus Klepp a écrit : > > > Am Montag, 30. Oktober 2017 schrieb J. Fahrner: > > >> https://osseu17.sched.com/event/ByYt/replace-your-exploit-ridden-firmware-with-linux-ronald-minnich-google > > > Nice. But it they suffer from the "not invented here"-syndrome: instead > > > of using prooven good busysbox, they rewrite userspace in GO .. oops, who > > > "invented" Go and wants to push it to the users? > > > > > > > Nik, Though I agree that Busybox is proven good, it remains that > > the said system is more than an OS and is to run at least one > > application on top of Busybox. This application must be written in some > > language. > > Busybox provides interpreted languages, Ash, Hush and Awk, but I > > doubt they would be a good choice for a complex application. The > > application should rather be written in some compiled language and one > > cannot deny the author the choice of this language, provided it is open > > source. You know what my preferred language would be, but, from what > > I've briefly read about Go, it seems to be based on not so bad rationale. > > Hi Didier, > > please look at the presentation, 2. slide: it says "This is to a shell prompt > in Linux" and "All userland written in Go", so it's not about any application > "on top of this written in go", but plain busybox rewritten in Go. > > Nik > > > -- Please do not email me anything that you are not comfortable also sharing with the NSA, CIA ... _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
