I think it was important to point this situation out. If distributing free 
software can potentially get you into a legal situation this quickly, then it's 
just not worth the headache that follows.

IMHO..

The primary reason for searching for an alternative to firefox is not that it 
sucks but because they are no longer the banner for freedom we once enjoyed 
getting behind. That's actually what's really been missing here, which goes as 
far back to the ads in tabs (and DRM/EME) situation.

The only thing I can see working, is if developers are happy to remove features 
and stop rebasing most of their work on firefox and syncing up with their 
codebase. That and starting a project with a clear goal to protect user freedom 
and privacy.

​Thanks,

chillfan

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

On March 31, 2018 2:52 AM, Steve Litt <[email protected]> wrote:

[quote]

> But to me, vendors matter, and I won't use software
> 
> from somebody as douchatudenous as this guy. He makes Linus and Lennart
> 
> look like pleasant people.
> SteveT
> 
> Steve Litt


_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng

Reply via email to