Quoting aitor_czr ([email protected]): > Scientific Linux is a CentOS based distribution,
Indeed, which in turn is an RHEL rebuild, with the result that they are both RHEL rebuilds. I'm thus really not sure what your point is. > But..., read here: > > https://www.centos.org/legal/ Yes, and your point is? I was very peripherally involved with the CentOS Project (_very_ indirectly) when a blow-up happened where the webmaster freaked out about a letter received from Red Hat Legal, making aggessive noises concerning trademark policy and demanding that CentOS Project take a bunch of further steps. The webmaster on that occasion changed all CentOS Web pages to remove all mention of Red Hat's distribution by name, substituting (IIRC) the phrase 'a North American enterprise Linux distribution'. It's very common for trademark stakeholders to issue unjustifiably aggressive threat letters for reasons Cory Doctorow explains in an article I link from the top of my own trademark-law article as an excellent overview: http://www.openp2p.com/pub/a/p2p/2003/08/14/trademarks.html _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
