On Mon, 30 Apr 2018 14:43:48 +0100, KatolaZ wrote in message <[email protected]>:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 09:26:14AM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote: > > I'm running ascii. > > > > Is there a good reason why the emacs metapackage depends on emacs24 > > and not on emacs25, which appears also to be available in > > the repositories? > > > > The reason is that the emacs maintainers wanted to have emacs25 in > stretch, but did not manage to fix all the rc bugs in some > emacs25-related packages in time for the release, so eventually they > decided to skip both emacs24 and emacs25. There was also a ML thread > somewhere about that. ..these?: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=851823 ..https://wiki.debian.org/Emacs25InStretch rather suggests they may be fixing it? > This sucks a bit, ..aye. Failure paste: https://pastebin.com/nHMur7zD > but still.... > > HTH > > KatolaZ -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
