On Mon, 30 Apr 2018 19:02:46 +0200, Arnt wrote in message <20180430190246.7552688e@d44>:
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2018 14:43:48 +0100, KatolaZ wrote in message > <[email protected]>: > > > On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 09:26:14AM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote: > > > I'm running ascii. > > > > > > Is there a good reason why the emacs metapackage depends on > > > emacs24 and not on emacs25, which appears also to be available in > > > the repositories? > > > > > > > The reason is that the emacs maintainers wanted to have emacs25 in > > stretch, but did not manage to fix all the rc bugs in some > > emacs25-related packages in time for the release, so eventually they > > decided to skip both emacs24 and emacs25. There was also a ML thread > > somewhere about that. > > ..these?: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=851823 > > ..https://wiki.debian.org/Emacs25InStretch rather suggests > they may be fixing it? > > > > This sucks a bit, > > ..aye. Failure paste: https://pastebin.com/nHMur7zD ...and all it took to fix it, was "dpkg -P edb". Doh. reportbug edb in progress. :o) > > but still.... > > > > HTH > > > > KatolaZ > > > -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
