On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 10:20:46PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 10:09:37AM +0100, Simon Hobson wrote: > > Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI <[email protected]> wrote: > > > If the developpers are worried about users wandering into unsafe sites, > > > I would understand a warning, but why the complete blockage ? > > While not directly addressing your problem, it's a symptom of the "nothing > > old exists, all (would be) legacy stuff gets replaced by 3 years old, we > > don't care" approach from several quarters.
This might not be relevant, but I have a "legacy" switch/router. It does not have wifi, so there are no free firmwares to use. The problem with connecting securely, as I recall is that the manufacturer had/has several brands, and the certificate had a mismatch there. When I used to use firefox, it allowed me to specify a "security" exception, and then I could connect. Nowadays, I usually use Palemoon (I know that some people here object to the licence conditions, so let's not go there now). That also allows me to declare an exception and connect. This is from memory, and may not be quite right, but perhaps may give a clue. You will want to know how to allow an exception. As I recall that was offered when the security problem is detected. You problem might be different, of course. ael _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
