> http://www.circleid.com/posts/20130820_a_question_of_dns_protocols > disappointed me with this characterization of RRL: > > There is a conversation thread that says that resolvers should > implement response rate limiting (RRL), and silently discard > repetitive queries that exceed some locally configured threshold. > > That ignores the "slip" parameter. That is irritating given the > relevant implications of slip=2 as the default in one RRL implementation > and the popular alternative of slip=1. > > I was also disappointing that it failed to mention the crushing > costs of DNS/TCP.
jeezus! it was a *measurement* study. that it did not parade your or someone elses banner is irrelevant. randy _______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations dns-jobs mailing list https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
