Vernon Schryver wrote:
> http://www.circleid.com/posts/20130820_a_question_of_dns_protocols
> disappointed me with this characterization of RRL:
>
>     There is a conversation thread that says that resolvers should
>     implement response rate limiting (RRL), and silently discard
>     repetitive queries that exceed some locally configured threshold.

that wording did not leap out at me at the time, but, is factually
wrong. RRL is on the server side not the resolver side.

vixie

_______________________________________________
dns-operations mailing list
dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
dns-jobs mailing list
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs

Reply via email to