On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 04:24:53PM +0000, ? Roy Arends <[email protected]> wrote a message of 121 lines which said:
> I donβt understand the problem. Do you expect nic.red to be > dnssec-signed? Not at all. I expect its non-signature to be validated, but it isn't. % dig SOA nic.red ; <<>> DiG 9.8.4-rpz2+rl005.12-P1 <<>> SOA nic.red ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 54620 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1 ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: ; EDNS: version: 0, flags: do; udp: 4096 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;nic.red. IN SOA ;; Query time: 712 msec ;; SERVER: ::1#53(::1) ;; WHEN: Mon Jan 20 17:29:20 2014 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 36 _______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations dns-jobs mailing list https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
