On Jan 20, 2014, at 11:37 , 🔒 Roy Arends <[email protected]> wrote:

> The problem is indeed the absence of type NS in the type bit maps, as you 
> (and Peter van
> Dijk) showed in your previous mail.

It’s hard to see from outside since its all the same NS set, but I suspect red. 
and nic.red. are separate zones, but that there is no delegation from red. to 
nic.red.  I’ve seen that mistake before.  With the same NS set it wouldn’t 
appear as a problem prior to signing.


_______________________________________________
dns-operations mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
dns-jobs mailing list
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs

Reply via email to