On Jan 21, 2014, at 06:13 , Chris Thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > On Jan 20 2014, Matthew Pounsett wrote: > >> It’s hard to see from outside since its all the same NS set, but I suspect >> red. and nic.red. are separate zones, but that there is no delegation from >> red. to nic.red. I’ve seen that mistake before. With the same NS set it >> wouldn’t appear as a problem prior to signing. > > But there shouldn't have been a "prior to signing" state for "red", should > there? "In the absence of validation" might be an explanation, though.
No, there wouldn’t be a prior to signing state for “red”, but there would be a prior to signing state for the operators. _______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations dns-jobs mailing list https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
