On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Paul Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Oct 17, 2014, at 11:59 AM, Phillip Hallam-Baker <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>
>> Won't we need to move to the [email protected] list to start the WG discussion?
>
> No, the announcement of the WG being formed said that this list is the WG's 
> list.

Yup, as does the datatracker / charter page.

However, many people automatically assume that the list for a wg is
[email protected]. I don't really want to do this, but Phillip does
make a good point... What would y'all like to do?

A: keep the list name as dns-privacy@
B: request that the list be migrated / renamed / whatever to dprive@

I was hoping that we could charter, figure out what we are doing,
document that and shut down fast enough that it wouldn't matter,
but...

W

>
> --Paul Hoffman
> _______________________________________________
> dns-privacy mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy



-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf

_______________________________________________
dns-privacy mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy

Reply via email to