On Oct 18, 2014, at 8:58 AM, Warren Kumari <war...@kumari.net> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@vpnc.org> wrote: >> On Oct 17, 2014, at 11:59 AM, Phillip Hallam-Baker <i...@hallambaker.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Won't we need to move to the dpr...@ietf.org list to start the WG >>> discussion? >> >> No, the announcement of the WG being formed said that this list is the WG's >> list. > > Yup, as does the datatracker / charter page. > > However, many people automatically assume that the list for a wg is > wg_n...@ietf.org. And, when they are wrong, their mail bounces in an obvious fashion. > I don't really want to do this, but Phillip does > make a good point... No, he doesn't. Ten years ago, that was common; today, a large percentage of WGs that started as BoFs have the mailing list name different from the WG name. > What would y'all like to do? > > A: keep the list name as dns-privacy@ > B: request that the list be migrated / renamed / whatever to dprive@ Please do A. B makes things harder for everyone, particularly those who want to see the discussion to date. Other WGs in the same situation as us have done *just fine*, and this seems like senseless process that will hinder our work. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list dns-privacy@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
