I didn't even know that it was optional. Certainly namedroppers wasn't allowed to keep its name despite a twenty odd year history.
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Warren Kumari <war...@kumari.net> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@vpnc.org> > wrote: > > On Oct 17, 2014, at 11:59 AM, Phillip Hallam-Baker <i...@hallambaker.com> > wrote: > > > >> Won't we need to move to the dpr...@ietf.org list to start the WG > discussion? > > > > No, the announcement of the WG being formed said that this list is the > WG's list. > > Yup, as does the datatracker / charter page. > > However, many people automatically assume that the list for a wg is > wg_n...@ietf.org. I don't really want to do this, but Phillip does > make a good point... What would y'all like to do? > > A: keep the list name as dns-privacy@ > B: request that the list be migrated / renamed / whatever to dprive@ > > I was hoping that we could charter, figure out what we are doing, > document that and shut down fast enough that it wouldn't matter, > but... > > W > > > > > --Paul Hoffman > > _______________________________________________ > > dns-privacy mailing list > > dns-privacy@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy > > > > -- > I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad > idea in the first place. > This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing > regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair > of pants. > ---maf >
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list dns-privacy@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
