On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Paul Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote: > On Oct 27, 2014, at 1:03 AM, Hosnieh Rafiee <[email protected]> wrote: >> I guess you have heard about CGA-TSIG. What do you think about the approach >> explained there? > > Is still has many confusing dependencies that make it hard to understand, and > it vastly oversells the IPv4 capabilities. > >> What do you think? > > It is a distraction for this WG and should not be considered.
+1 W > > --Paul Hoffman > _______________________________________________ > dns-privacy mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
