> > So why do you think it is distraction for the WG that addresses > privacy? > > I said I thought it was a distraction; discussing it further would be > more of a distraction.
Unfortunately, I haven't received any answer to the question that "why it is distraction?". I only received ambiguous answer to the question. I do not think WG decided on any solution space , if the scope is not to have any encryption, then I agree with you. But I couldn't see anything on charter about this. Best, Hosnieh _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list dns-privacy@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
