Hi Paul, I'm not sure if your point was meant to relate only to DHCP setting the DNS server IP, but if not then I have a question...
On 13/04/15 21:21, Paul Wouters wrote: > If you have an attacker on the last mile, there is nothing you can do. > Passive only protection against the last mile is a wasted effort. On > the last mile, there are only active attackers. Do you have evidence of the absence of passive attackers and if so with what definition of last mile? Noting that an active attack is possible does not IMO mean that defence against a passive attack is worthless. That is a case that would need to be made IMO. And the counter argument is that the probability of an active attack may differ significantly from the probability of a passive attack. Basically, I think you're overstating things in the quoted text. S. > > Paul > > _______________________________________________ > dns-privacy mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy > > _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
