On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 05:36:10PM -0400, Daniel Migault <[email protected]> wrote a message of 149 lines which said:
> Just for information, what are the technical reasons IPsec has not > been considered at all for providing DNS privacy. It _was_ considered during the meeting in London: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/89/dnse.html http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/89/minutes/minutes-89-dnse (the talk by Eric Rescorla, "IPsec probably isn't going to work here") _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
