Warren, I think that any/all of the documents can add issues and address the two points that Phillip raised, so I agree with your no-hats statement and I support the starting of a call for adoption, rather than discussing the points (and others) in vacuo.
FYI - we are about to update the dns-over-tls draft with new material, some of which pertains to Phillip’s issue 1 in particular; there were verbal comments in Dallas about that issue from several parties. Allison > On Apr 13, 2015, at 10:57 AM, Warren Kumari <[email protected]> wrote: > > [ Top post ] > > What do other think here -- do we want to decide on the discovery and > binding problem first, or do we think that we should choose a document > and start working on that (and possibly add in discovery / binding > later)? > > <no-hats> > I'd personally like to start working on a document - i think it helps > focus us in something concrete, and will move the discussion from an > abstract type thing to actually getting work done... > </no-hats> > > W >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
