On Apr 30, 2015, at 9:21 PM, Watson Ladd <[email protected]> wrote: >>> If the anycast changes then you are going to have to timeout and resume. >> >> This is also true for HTTP. I still don't see why DNS needs more routing >> stability than HTTP. > > DNS doesn't. But proposals like DNS over TLS rely on extremely long > lived connections.
I'm still confused about this. Why does the connection need to be "extremely long lived" for stub-to-resolver? From everything that I have heard in TLS over the years, if you have to tear down and re-establish the connection, it goes quite quickly. Is there research that shows differently? --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
