On Monday, April 27, 2015, at 5:22 PM, Warren Kumari wrote > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Paul Hoffman <[email protected]> > > There is a third solution to the "anycast problem", which is what is done > today in all systems that use anycast: assume that it happens so rarely, that > a > rare reset is just fine. > > ... > Many (most?) of these properties run HTTPS. From what I hear, fastly > customers are happy chappies -- TCP anycast works...
OK. Let's put this anycast/UDP/TCP thread to rest, and agree that this is not a problem in practice. And if that's true, then we should just pick UDP/TLS/TCP and be done with it. -- Christian Huitema _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
