At Mon, 26 Oct 2015 19:05:56 +0100, Simon Josefsson <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I have some preliminary question about the 'If'. I don't remember > > exactly how the DNS/DTLS draft became a wg document, but IIRC when we > > adopted DNS/TLS from several candidates the decision was to focus on > > this particular solution while allowing flexibility of discussions > > other ideas at a lower priority, so we can at least publish one > > concrete solution document as soon as possible. I have no problem of > > discussing DNS/DTLS itself, but if my understanding about the wg focus > > is correct, I don't think it a good idea to delay publishing DNS/TLS > > because of it implication with DNS/DTLS. In that sense merging these > > two drafts doesn't seem to be a good idea to me. Extracting and > > deferring some parts of DNS/TLS may be acceptable if the resulting > > DNS/TLS draft is still a self-contained document to be published. > > Both DNS/TLS and DNS/DTLS were adopted by the WG, check the mailing list > archives. I know DNS/TLS was adopted by the WG (was I unclear about that in my previous message?). My question was about the significance of the adoption of DNS/DTLS, especially about whether DNS/DTLS should affect the progress of DNS/TLS or whether we rather want the latter to be published sooner as long as it's complete other than issues related to DTLS interaction. -- JINMEI, Tatuya _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
