Dear DPRIVE WG, Tim and I discussed the WGLC earlier today and believe that there is sufficient support to progress the document.
Authors - please work to address the comments received (they are not major) and let us know once you think they are acceptable. Thanks again to everyone who commented, and special thanks to the authors for all of the work and revisions. ... and now... profiles :-P W On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Warren Kumari <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear DPRIVE WG, > > The authors of draft-ietf-dprive-dnsodtls have indicated that they > believe that the document is ready, and have asked for Working Group > Last Call. > > The draft is available here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dprive-dnsodtls/ > > Please review this draft to see if you think it is ready for > publication and send comments to the list, clearly stating your view. > > This WGLC ends Tue 30-Aug-2016. > > In addition, to satisfy RFC 6702 ("Promoting Compliance with > Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)"): > Are you personally aware of any IPR that applies to > draft-ietf-dprive-dnsodtls? If so, has this IPR been disclosed in > compliance with IETF IPR rules? (See RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669, and 5378 > for more details.) > > Thanks, > Warren Kumari > (as DPRIVE WG co-chair) > > > -- > I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad > idea in the first place. > This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing > regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair > of pants. > ---maf -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
