> On Jul 25, 2018, at 12:37, Paul Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote: > Some resolver operators have recently spoken of a new use case: giving > assurance of results in unsigned zones, and assurance of child NS and glue > records in signed zones. This use case is not about privacy. That should not be considered a valid use case for privacy or otherwise. No one should trust data delivered over the internet without origin security, regardless of which protocol we are talking about. Paul, who strongly dislikes dns is the last protocol left on the internet where some people argue the protocol needed no protection. _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
- [dns-privacy] Recursive Resolver Operator Perspective Brian Haberman
- [dns-privacy] Recursive Resolver Operator Perspective Brian Haberman
- Re: [dns-privacy] Recursive Resolver Operator Pers... Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dns-privacy] Recursive Resolver Operator ... Paul Wouters
- Re: [dns-privacy] Recursive Resolver Opera... Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dns-privacy] Recursive Resolver Operator Pers... Brian Haberman
- Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] Recursive Resolver Op... Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] Recursive Resolve... Tony Finch
- Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] Recursive Re... Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] Recursiv... Tony Finch
- Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] Recu... Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] Recu... Tony Finch
- Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] Recu... Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] Recu... Tony Finch
