All,
Thanks for a productive set of exchanges on the user perspective
last week! I would like the focus for this week (10/1-10/7) to be on
clarifying the requirements from the perspective of the recursive
resolver operator. So far, I have seen:* DNS transaction privacy w/o authentication * DNS transaction privacy w/ authentication of the authoritative server(s) Do others have additional requirements? If you agree with the above, could you describe a scenario to highlight the requirements? Regards, Brian On 7/19/18 2:24 PM, Brian Haberman wrote: > This thread is for discussion of the recursive resolver operator > perspective of DNS privacy between the recursive resolver and > authoritative servers. > > - Focus on *what* is needed. > - Avoid *how* to achieve it. > - Consider both ends of DNS the exchange. > - Scenarios will frame the discussion. > > > > _______________________________________________ > dns-privacy mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
