All,
I would like the focus for this week (9/24-9/30) to be on
clarifying the requirements from the user's perspective. So far, I have
seen:* DNS transaction privacy, if possible * User willingness to send PII if transaction is encrypted Do others have additional requirements? If you agree with the above, could you describe a scenario to highlight the requirements? Regards, Brian On 7/19/18 2:23 PM, Brian Haberman wrote: > This thread is for discussion of the user perspective of DNS privacy > between the recursive resolver and authoritative servers. > > - Focus on *what* is needed. > - Avoid *how* to achieve it. > - Consider both ends of DNS the exchange. > - Scenarios will frame the discussion. > > > > _______________________________________________ > dns-privacy mailing list > dns-privacy@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list dns-privacy@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
