On 2018-09-24 16:08, Brian Haberman wrote: > All, > I would like the focus for this week (9/24-9/30) to be on > clarifying the requirements from the user's perspective. So far, I have > seen: > > * DNS transaction privacy, if possible > * User willingness to send PII if transaction is encrypted > > Do others have additional requirements?
I propose to add: * Data management practises (i.e. profiling, advertisement, re-selling, etc) > If you agree with the above, could you describe a scenario to highlight > the requirements? I have difficulties seeing how a user (within the meaning of individual internet consumer) has any practical choice to other than to share PII with a DNS provider? It's not so much about "willingness" as it is about "feeling comfortable with". best regards, Amelia > Regards, > Brian > > On 7/19/18 2:23 PM, Brian Haberman wrote: >> This thread is for discussion of the user perspective of DNS privacy >> between the recursive resolver and authoritative servers. >> >> - Focus on *what* is needed. >> - Avoid *how* to achieve it. >> - Consider both ends of DNS the exchange. >> - Scenarios will frame the discussion. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dns-privacy mailing list >> dns-privacy@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy >> > > _______________________________________________ > dns-privacy mailing list > dns-privacy@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy -- Amelia Andersdotter Technical Consultant, Digital Programme ARTICLE19 www.article19.org PGP: 3D5D B6CA B852 B988 055A 6A6F FEF1 C294 B4E8 0B55 _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list dns-privacy@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
