Hello,
I now read through the whole document, and I see one thing that might be
a little bit confusing - the beginning of page three reads like QNAME
minimization is not possible or at least never done, and contrary to
rfc7626 itself it isn't even mentioned in the whole document. I would
suggest to at least reduce the strength of the wording ("always"),
and/or mention rfc7816. I don't have much data at hand, but I believe
that some reduction of QNAMEs isn't as exotic as it used to be.
Then there's a problem with many dead links, which would be nice to
improve somehow:
[sidn-entrada] [grangeia.snooping] [pitfalls-of-dns-encrption]
[packetq-list] [morecowbell].
[packetq] redirects OK to the new location, but perhaps it would be
better to link it (more) directly.
--Vladimir
_______________________________________________
dns-privacy mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
