> On 19 Aug 2019, at 10:58 pm, Vladimír Čunát <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hello, > > I now read through the whole document, and I see one thing that might be > a little bit confusing - the beginning of page three reads like QNAME > minimization is not possible or at least never done, and contrary to > rfc7626 itself it isn't even mentioned in the whole document. I would > suggest to at least reduce the strength of the wording ("always"), > and/or mention rfc7816. I don't have much data at hand, but I believe > that some reduction of QNAMEs isn't as exotic as it used to be.
A recent measurement of the use of Qname minimisation can be found at: http://www.potaroo.net/ispcol/2019-08/qmin.html tl;dr: A 3% of users were observed to use recursive resolvers that perform qname minimisation in the Internet. Far higher levels of use of qname minimisation are found in some national communities. I have no idea if a use level of 3% of users is “exotic” or not. _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
