> On 19 Aug 2019, at 13:58, Vladimír Čunát <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, > > I now read through the whole document, and I see one thing that might be > a little bit confusing - the beginning of page three reads like QNAME > minimization is not possible or at least never done, and contrary to > rfc7626 itself it isn't even mentioned in the whole document. I would > suggest to at least reduce the strength of the wording ("always"), > and/or mention rfc7816. I don't have much data at hand, but I believe > that some reduction of QNAMEs isn't as exotic as it used to be.
Thanks for catching that oversight, the document should be updated to reference RFC7816, which didn’t exist when the first version was published! > Then there's a problem with many dead links, which would be nice to > improve somehow: > [sidn-entrada] [grangeia.snooping] [pitfalls-of-dns-encrption] > [packetq-list] [morecowbell]. > [packetq] redirects OK to the new location, but perhaps it would be > better to link it (more) directly. Agreed - these all need careful review. Regards Sara. _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
