Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:> * "A DNS privacy service must be engineered for high availability." > I'm not in favor of this sentence. 1) It seems to despise small > resolvers managed by small organisations, while we need many diverse > DoT and DoH resolvers, to avoid centralisation 2) Today, Firefox, > unfortunately, does not allow to add more than one DoH resolver, > which makes the DoH resolver a very critical resource. But I hope > that in the future, we will be able to configure several resolvers, > with an efficient fallback, making the issue of availability less > important.
I second that. > “A DNS privacy service should strive to engineer encrypted services > to the same availability level as any unencrypted services they > provide.”? Sounds good to me. > * DROP is not a perfect acronym +1 maybe "DROPS"? > "be held only memory" "in memory.." kind regards, Christoph _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
