I oppose adoption of this document. I don't see any advantage over DoH, as that standard will accrue QUIC benefits as HTTP stacks shift to HTTP/3.
Maybe it's possible to block a port and use QUIC with this draft? That might be useful, but perhaps needs a little more running code. thanks, Rob On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 9:41 AM Tim Wicinski <[email protected]> wrote: > > This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-huitema-dprive-dnsoquic > > The draft is available here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-huitema-dprive-dnsoquic/ > > Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption > by DPRIVE, and comments to the list, clearly stating your view. > > Please also indicate if you are willing to contribute text, review, etc. > > This call for adoption ends: 22 April 2020 > > Thanks, > tim/brian > _______________________________________________ > dns-privacy mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy >
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
