Moin!
On 8 Apr 2020, at 18:55, Paul Hoffman wrote:
On Apr 8, 2020, at 9:41 AM, Tim Wicinski <[email protected]> wrote:
This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-huitema-dprive-dnsoquic
The draft is available here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-huitema-dprive-dnsoquic/
Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for
adoption
by DPRIVE, and comments to the list, clearly stating your view.
I support adoption of this draft and am willing to review and maybe
contribute text
This draft is better than earlier versions, but still is missing
something that seems crucial: detailed comparison between the protocol
described here, DoT, and DoH. The suggestion in the text that the
comparison would be added after there are implementations seems like
the comparison would be about speed, but comparisons about protocol
complexity, security, and privacy seem incredibly important as well.
Ok let me try. DoT is based on TCP and thus the connection handling will
have to put more bits on the wire. DoH being based on HTTP that has an
arbitrary meta data layer in the protocol that is a privacy nightmare.
The WG might delay adoption until this significant part is added to
the document.
I don’t think the WG should delay this, especially as recent
approaches to secure DNS transports (NS2) take different transports into
account so having one more doesn’t hurt.
So long
-Ralf
—--
Ralf Weber
_______________________________________________
dns-privacy mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
