Correct, Stephane, the notification from resolver is more direct. However, based on DHCP/ICMP is also an approach because the end-user is always bootstrapping based on DHCP/ICMP for the address configuration and so on. Besides, the configuration of resolver can be supported by DHCP/ICMP and only an extension is needed based on RFC3646/4339...
Z.W. Yan From: Stephane Bortzmeyer Date: 2020-07-21 03:28 To: Z.W. Yan CC: dns-privacy; gggeng; xincha.zhang; liuyang7 Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-yan-dprive-local-service-indication-02.txt On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 10:17:57AM +0800, Z.W. Yan <[email protected]> wrote a message of 120 lines which said: > The motivation of this draft is to actively indicate the privacy > protection capability of the recursive server. The approach in draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-information seems better since: * it is more general, not limited to privacy, * the information is sent by the resolver itself, who probably knows better than the DHCP server.
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
