Thanks Brian, that is my reading of the thread as well. I agree that the conversation that's been had provides ample input for the requirements draft.
On Mon, 2020-09-21 at 14:13 -0400, Brian Haberman wrote: > Hi all, > The chairs have determined there is currently no support to adopt > this document at this time. The chairs encourage the authors and the WG > to discuss how this approach may inform the phase 2 requirements draft. > > Regards, > Brian > > On 8/10/20 7:44 AM, Brian Haberman wrote: > > Hi all, > > During the DPRIVE session at IETF108, we discussed adopting > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vandijk-dprive-ds-dot-signal-and-pin/ > > and the results were inconclusive. The chairs would like to start a > > 2-week call for adoption to determine the WG's interest in this work. > > > > Please respond to the mailing list with your view (positive or > > negative) and supporting rationale on adopting the draft. This WGLC will > > end on 2020-08-24 at 23:59 UTC. > > > > Regards, > > Brian & Tim > > Kind regards, -- Peter van Dijk PowerDNS.COM BV - https://www.powerdns.com/ _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
