Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bis-06: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bis/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I'll add my thanks for this document. I have tripped on some of the issues in my experience, but some of the others described here were eye-opening. I'm also learning from the ensuing discussions. Section 1: A couple of nits: * "DNS relies on caching heavily ..." -- suggest "DNS relies heavily on caching ..." * "Both are a big privacy concern since ..." -- suggest "Both are big privacy concerns since ...", unless you mean the two of them collectively (in which case, please say so) I agree with Warren in that it's not clear what's leaking in the example at the bottom of the second paragraph of Section 4.2. In Section 5.1, please expand "CPE" on first use. I'm having trouble parsing the third paragraph of Section 5.2. The fourth paragraph in the same section needs some commas. _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
