On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 4:48 PM Martin Thomson <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021, at 00:00, Brian Haberman wrote: > > This starts a DPRIVE WG call for adoption for > > draft-pauly-dprive-oblivious-doh > > (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-pauly-dprive-oblivious-doh/). > > Please reply to the mailing list with your views (positive or negative) > > on the WG adopting the document and your supporting arguments. > > Adopt. I will then encourage the working group to adopt oblivious HTTP > (which we're in the process of chartering) rather than build a parallel > design. > > Unlike ekr, I think that aiming for Proposed Standard is better than > Experimental. There is nothing wrong with a narrow scope of applicability, > though in this case that narrow scope might still provide benefit for a > great many people. > To clarify my position: i would favor a proposed standard based on O-HTTP. I just think it's unfortunate to have something that is approximately O-HTTP but not precisely as PS at the same time as we are also standardizing O-HTTP -Ekr > _______________________________________________ > dns-privacy mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy >
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
