On Thu, Mar 18, 2021, at 11:04, Eric Rescorla wrote: > To clarify my position: i would favor a proposed standard based on > O-HTTP. I just think it's unfortunate to have something that is > approximately O-HTTP but not precisely as PS at the same time as we are > also standardizing O-HTTP
Makes sense. I would question the value of publishing the experimental approximately-but-not-quite-O-HTTP version then. Unless we fail majestically in chartering and executing there, we're not talking about significant delays. Regarding O-HTTP, we have in-principle agreement to charter a working group and I've drafted a charter (preview: https://github.com/unicorn-wg/ohttp-charter). That will be discussed on the secdispatch@ list as soon as I send that email. _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
